In the past ten years a vibrant environment of alternative writing platforms has emerged, frequently aiming to take on some of the recognized issues with traditional periodicals other than cost. These networks can differ right from journals in lots of ways, of their disciplinary scope and guide type towards the way they may be funded or governed. They can likewise disaggregate paper features such as public record, editorial variety and expert review or perhaps focus on a wider variety of investigate outcomes.

A primary reason why these types of platforms are called alternative is that they give a different unit for contribution in the scholarly system, offering more democratic and open up modes of socio-technical company. They often offer alternatives for the restrictive models of participation embodied simply by corporate programs and, therefore , are a vital part of the constant discussion around how you can improve via the internet democracy.

However , the term ‘alternative’ risks becoming seen as narrow or perhaps restrictive plus the fact that many of those new websites are based on existing code and features signifies that they may have difficulty fitting into a definition of precisely what is an alternative building platform. To assist with this, over the summer season 2022 Knowledge Exchange started a project that is exploring what these platforms do and how they can be placed in the wider start scholarly conversation ecosystem. The first thing was the syndication of a scoping paper, followed by a set of questions designed to distinguish and better understand these types of new entrants.

This review was provided for a wide variety of organisations, both people who self-identified for the reason that alternative publishing programs and other research/scholarly communication stakeholders (including universities, funders and the wider research community). As such, many of the responses might not fully in shape the ‘alternative’ definition.

The responses for the questionnaire were analysed to identify commonalities and differences in how these fresh publishing platforms perform. The main locating was that most of the platforms that responded thought about themselves being alternative and that the majority of them had been not-for-profit. Yet , the understanding characteristics for almost all of these has not been their business or revenue version but rather their particular academic/institutional beginnings and their focus on open gain access to, open source code, and open expert review.

Other aspects of the actual a platform an alternative were also identified, such as the level to which they will offered a wider disciplinary scope than traditional publishers, whether they were based on submitted versions/preprints or utilized open permits and so on. The findings were consolidated and the progress a visualisation prototype commenced, together with the technology of your initial taxonomy.

The expansion of these tools suggests that the demand for alternatives to dominant social media sites is strong. However , it is necessary to avoid complacency. As these alternative platforms grow, they will deal with the same complications as other digital technologies in fact it is essential that they continue to make customer service their priority. If they will fail to try this, their benefit over popular sites will begin to fade away.